Celebration of Learning

In this post, I will highlight how I have sufficiently met each of the course learning outcomes for EDCI 338.

Examine the application of social media to support learning

There are many ways in which various social medias help to support learning and expand one’s Personal Learning Network (PLN). In my “Wow and Wonder #1” post, I mention how PLNs are made up of many meaningful connections with the intention of learning from/with others. Social media platforms can be used for a variety of different purposes (personal, educational, professional, etc.) and to help form these connections. They also make learning much more accessible, engaging, and relevant for learners as they are now growing up in the digital age. For example, I enrolled in a drawing course where I was required to periodically show evidence of my learning throughout the semester. I chose to document my drawing progress through the use of YouTube videos so that I could share them with my peers, my professor, and others who were also interested in learning how to draw. I chose to upload my Sketchbook Video as unlisted because I value my privacy and I wanted to control who would be able to view my video. However, there is a downside that comes with the territory of having an increase in accessibility to different sources of information. Internet users are given much more power over the type of content that can be found on the Web through the use of social media and other online platforms. In my “Wow and Wonder #5” post, I address the idea of ampliganda, the shaping of perception through amplification, and the potential to believe and/or to be swept up in the false narratives that circulate online. This is why it is critical for internet users to be cautious when interacting with online content.

Explain personalized learning and its relation to learning theory

After reading the article, “Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age,” I discovered the relation between personalized learning and learning theory – the process of expanding one’s learning, knowledge, and understanding through a personal network is the essence of connectivism. In Mary’s blog, “Post #2 (Week 3),” she describes connectivism as an intricate and flexible theory that places a greater importance on “individuals communicating their gained experiences across online communities and platforms.” In my “Wow and Wonder #2” post, I discuss how this theory is quite different from behaviourism, constructivism, and cognitivism as these theories believe that the learning process involves internalizing external knowledge. Connectivism has evolved past the other learning theories because it does not acquire knowledge in a linear manner and it utilizes technology tools to help with information storage and retrieval. This allows for an increased focus on personalized learning where more time can be spent on finding hidden meanings within the chaos as well as developing and maintaining connections to facilitate lifelong learning. Additionally, reading Mia’s blog, “Wow and Wonder Week 8,” opened my eyes to the difference between adult and child learning as she clearly and concisely summarizes the principles of adult learning theory. As an new elementary and middle school teacher, I now have a better understanding of how to personalize learning content for adults as well as children.

Recognize that the Internet is not a neutral or equal space for everyone

People use the internet at various degrees and for a plethora of different purposes. In the article, “Visitors and Residents: A new typology for online engagement,” I learned about how the Visitor/Resident continuum should replace Prensky’s Digital Natives/Digital Immigrants typology in regards to online engagement as it focuses more on types of behaviour rather than types of people. When it comes to technology use, what may be second-nature to some, may be quite challenging for others. Therefore, the internet is not a neutral or equal space for everyone. However, even though older generations may not have the same ease when using technology tools as younger generations, it does not mean that they are incapable of learning how to effectively use the tools that are suitable to their daily technology needs (which are likely to look quite different than the needs of a person who was surrounded by technology from a young age). In my “Wow and Wonder #3” post, I created my own Visitor/Resident map to document my internet use and to show where I fall on the spectrum. Each internet user’s map would look completely unique as we all have our own personal interests, reasons, and needs in regards to how we engage with the Web.

Apply social media to develop a personal learning network in support of your personal and/or professional development

Over the course of this semester, I have utilized WordPress in order to expand my own PLN by sharing my own opinions, interacting with and learning from my peer’s posts, and engaging with course content. I often refer to my classmate’s blogs to develop my own ways of thinking when completing assignments and publishing my own posts. Additionally, my learning pod and I have made use of Github to connect with our other classmates as well as to communicate with one anther as we collaboratively worked on our major project for the course where we created Chapter 3 in the course book. Our chapter focuses solely on YouTube and provides detailed accounts of the platform’s demographics, privacy and surveillance, educational uses, concerns, public discourse, digital identity, accessibility, and media literacy. Through the course book, each learning pod is able to learn from and with the other 9 pods that each chose a different social media platform to research, collect information, and share their findings.

Identify privacy issues and practice online behaviours that are legal, safe, consensual, and ethical

I try to keep public information about myself to a minimum when engaging with the internet. After reading Jim Luke’s blog post, “That’s No Plagiarism Checker,” I am now more aware of the unfortunate fact that many online tools and platforms steal their users’ intellectual property under false pretenses and/or distraction tactics. For example, in my “Wow and Wonder #6” blog, I mention how TurnItIn, a tool designed for the purpose of detecting plagiarism in students’ work, is able to unethically coerce their users’ copyrights away from them. Furthermore, in Kayla’s blog, “Wow and Wonder Post #6,” she considers the likely possibility that most (if not all) social media platforms have surveillance systems in place to monitor our activity and record our data. Although there will probably always be some degree of data collecting and surveillance that occurs when we use social media platforms, I will try my best to keep this to a minimum and to be more mindful of keeping my data as private as possible when using different platforms. I will also try to spend more time reading the terms and conditions of the various websites and applications that I access in the future.

Recognize data ownership and licensing (Creative Commons, Copyright, Fair Dealing, and Public Domain) as a core practice when creating, sharing, or using resources online

Prior to taking this course, my knowledge of data ownership and licensing was quite limited. However, reading Leo’s blog, “Showcase Post 1,” helped to deepen my understanding of these topics. In his post, he provides clear descriptions of the two major privacy and security legislations in BC: Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA) and Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA). Leo also details their collaborative efforts to protect people’s personal information and to make sure that their information is used in a legal manner. In Mia’s blog, “Showcase Post #1,” she also touches on copyright concerns in regards to TikTok – a new and popular social media platform. My key takeaway from Mia’s post is that original content should be used whenever possible as this is the best way to ensure that you are not infringing on anyone else’s copyrights and to avoid getting your videos deleted and/or being faced with legal action.

Practice digital, networked, and open literacies in support of learning about social media and personalized learning

I have learned that open literacies play a major role in developing one’s PLN. In my “Wow and Wonder #7” post, I consider how “the open movement” has positively impacted the PLNs of many people (since the advancement of the Web) due to the fact that we now have access to a large number of open and online information sources that extend our reach like never before. Now that people are able to connect with each other and exchange information online, the wealth of accessible knowledge at our fingertips is endless. Concurrently, Ruth’s blog, “Week 9: Wow and Wonder,” also highlights the importance of expanding one’s PLN by forming connections and engaging with various types of social media. She goes on to state that the major project for this course is a perfect example of how we practiced digital, networked, and open literacies to support our learning of social media and the development of our PLNs as we have been given ample opportunities to engage with various social media platforms as well as to connect and learn from and with each other.

Wow and Wonder #7

For this Wow and Wonder post, I will be responding to Alec Couros’ chapter (chapter 6), “Developing Personal Learning Networks for Open and Social Learning,” in the book, “Emerging Technologies in Distance Education.”

Wow

I have not heard of “the open movement” before and it was interesting to read about the ideals behind it as well as how the barriers that originally came with the movement (such as limited access to resources, poor/weak software, etc.) were soon broken down by the advancement of the Web and other online technologies. As a result, people’s Personal Learning Networks (PLNs) were broadened and enriched by the vast number of information sources and the major increase in accessibility to these sources.

Wonder

I wonder what would have happened to “the open movement” if availability to and popularization of Web tools came years or even decades later. Would people still have found a way to connect with each other and reach various sources of information? What would learning and PLNs look like if using the Web and other technologies were not yet an option?

Resource

https://www.aupress.ca/app/uploads/120177_99Z_Veletsianos_2010-Emerging_Technologies_in_Distance_Education.pdf

Wow and Wonder #6

For this Wow and Wonder post, I will be responding to Jim Luke’s blog, “That’s No Plagiarism Checker,” regarding the use of a social media tool that surveils us for profit.

Wow

I was shocked to read how TurnItIn (TII), a tool who’s purpose is to detect plagiarism, is able to steal students’ intellectual property. As a student and a private person, this was upsetting to read as I feel as though it is an invasion of my privacy. I would not feel comfortable with the fact that TII could easily collect my data right out from under me while under false pretences. There should be precautions in place to protect the students who do not wish to share their data.

Wonder

Luke mentions how the pedagogy of mistrusting all students is awful and that it is unethical to steal their copyrights from them. While I agree with him, I found myself wondering about the best possible way to monitor/evaluate students’ work without having to compromise their privacy. In a perfect world, students would never cheat/plagiarize and teachers would never have to check students’ work for cheating/plagiarism. Unfortunately, we do not live in a perfect world. If given the opportunity, there will be students who cheat/plagiarize (after being a student for 18 years, I can attest to this). I wonder how can we protect students’ intellectual property while simultaneously checking the academic integrity of the work that they put forth.

Resource

https://econproph.com/2019/03/12/thats-no-plagiarism-checker/

Wow and Wonder #5

For this Wow and Wonder post, I will be responding to the article, “It’s Not Misinformation. It’s Amplified Propaganda.

Wow

I found the idea of “coordinated inauthentic behavior” to be quite shocking. I am not very active on Twitter and have rarely ever used hashtags, but I can understand how calculated posting and hashtag use, combined with enough manpower to flood the internet, would be able to completely alter or even take-over a narrative. This made me realize just how much power the Web, and its online platforms, gives to its users. It is a bit scary that our fellow internet users are able to control the information that we receive online in order to influence others and their way of thinking.

Wonder

I am curious about what more can be done to prevent the take-over of inaccurate information and/or the information that has been created by someone with an agenda on the Web. As an ordinary internet user, how can I confidently decide if the information that is presented to me is either fact or fiction? I wonder if there is an online software, application, or tool that could be created to help ensure that its users are receiving credible information.

Resource

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/10/disinformation-propaganda-amplification-ampliganda/620334/

Showcase Post #1

In this post, I will be expanding and polishing my original “Wow and Wonder #1” post in order to dive deeper into Personal Learning Networks (PLNs).

Wow

The idea that one’s Personal Learning Network (PLN) is comprised of many meaningful and individual connections with the intention of learning from/with that person is a new concept for me. Originally, I thought that a PLN was more similar to a Communities of Practice (CoP), where the people who make up your network are those who share your profession (Gutierrez, n.d.). I love the fact that PLNs can consist of informal and individual learning connections with anyone, from any field, as this can expand one’s unique network tremendously and allows for more information to be gathered and learned.

A classmate of mine, Mary, reflects on the progress that she has made thus far regarding the ongoing creation of her PLN on her own blog. Mary states that she uses LinkedIn, “the world’s premier business network with 722 million users as of January 2022” (Martin, 2022), in order to build various connections around an area of interest. I found this to be very interesting as I originally thought that LinkedIn was a platform intended for people in the world of business in order to find jobs, recruit employees, connect with people in the same discipline, etc. While my ideas about LinkedIn were not completely wrong, I have come to realize that anyone can be a part of this online platform to expand their own PLN. I think that joining an online platform such as LinkedIn is a great way to build, maintain, and activate connections “within [personal networks] for the purpose of improving [one’s] learning” (Rajagopal, Joosten-ten Brinke, Van Bruggen, & Sloep, 2011).

I found the video, “What is LinkedIn?” extremely helpful in gaining a stronger understanding about LinkedIn and clarifying some of my misconceptions regarding the platform. I would recommend watching this clear and brief video if you are also unsure as to what LinkedIn entails.

Wonder

On the flip side, I am curious if people ever run into issues of mistakenly creating connections with others who are providing them with inaccurate information when trying to expand their PLN. Since informal connections are a part of our PLNs – how can we be sure that all of the information that we are gathering is accurate and credible? These days, children can access countless topics on a wide range of platforms and sites from a very young age. Although I believe that technology is a tremendous tool for learning, I wonder if there such thing as too much exposure or access?

A friend and peer of mine, Kayla, discusses her views on children’s exposure to technology on her own blog. I find myself agreeing with Kayla’s opinions as we both grew up at the same time. The video that Kayla refers to in her blog post, “What is a Personal Learning Network (PLN)?“, mentions how our relationship with technology begins almost from the moment that we are born. I also strongly believe that children should be encouraged to engage in non-technology activities such as playing outside with friends, using their imagination to create games, experiencing the environment around them in a deep and meaningful way, etc. as too much time spent on a screen from a young age can be harmful. It is quite possible for a child to deem the things that they learn from the internet to be factual, when in reality, there is a chance that they could be getting their information from an unreliable source. This is why it is so important for parents and teachers to monitor children’s internet use and to teach them how to use technology tools in a positive and constructive manner. However, having a healthy balance between participating in on and off screen activities would be ideal. People are more likely to be fluent technology users if they are immersed in it from the time that they are young children. Since technology is becoming more and more prevalent in our world, I consider this to be an advantage as long as children are using technology for educational and productive purposes.

References

Gutierrez, K. (n.d.). What are Personal Learning Networks? Retrieved from https://www.shiftelearning.com/blog/personal-learning-networks

LinkedIn. (2010, April 5). What is LinkedIn? [Video File]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVlUwwgOfKw

Martin, M. (2022, January 17). How to Use Linkedin for Business in 2022: A Step-by-Step Guide. Retrieved from https://blog.hootsuite.com/linkedin-for-business/

Rajagopal, K., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., Van Bruggen, J., & Sloep, P. B. (2011). Understanding personal learning networks: Their structure, content and the networking skills needed to optimally use them. First Monday17(1). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v17i1.3559

What is a Personal Learning Network (PLN)? (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/learning-network-age/0/steps/24644

Wow and Wonder #4

For this Wow and Wonder post, I will be responding to two of Shelley Moore’s videos surrounding teaching to inclusion and diversity in the classroom.

Wow

In the video, “Shelley Moore: Transforming Inclusive Education,” Moore compares teaching to bowling. I had not thought of teaching in this way before. I definitely agree that as a teacher, if you aim for the middle, you will reach most students, but not everyone (the ones who are missed, are usually the ones who need the most support). In my own experience, I have noticed that teachers will spend extra time after a lesson to help the students who need extra support. While this strategy is effective, it is not very efficient and requires much more time and effort from teachers who already do so much. This is why I love Moore’s point about changing the aim and using the extra supports that all students will benefit from when teaching in order to reach as many students as possible from the get-go.

Evolution of Inclusion Diagram. Screen capture from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQgXBhPh5Zo

Wonder

In the video, “The Evolution of Inclusion: The past and future of education,” Moore wonders if we can still do better when it comes to inclusion of all students in the classroom and if there is another evolution in inclusion. I took some time to ponder this as this question requires a lot of thought. Eventually, I had an idea that the next evolution could look similar to inclusion, but without the dots (that represent students) being confined by the circle that surrounds them so that there can be more space between each dot. I am still struggling to think of a name for this next stage, but the idea of equity keeps coming to mind. This has also made me wonder – will there ever be an end to the evolution of inclusion? Or will there come a time where there is nothing more that can possibly be done to ensure that all students are included, supported, and given equal opportunities regarding their education?

Resources

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYtUlU8MjlY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQgXBhPh5Zo

Wow and Wonder #3

For this Wow and Wonder post, I will be responding to the article, “Visitors and Residents: A new typology for online engagement” as well as my own Visitor/Resident map.

Wow

The Visitor/Resident concept is new to me and I was quite interested to learn more about this topic. I had not thought of the different ways to use/interact with technology in this manner before reading this article and making my own map. The idea that “Visitors are users, not members, of the Web and place little value in belonging online” (White & Cornu, 2011) resonated with me and caused me to reflect on my own relationship with the Web. I would say that I fall somewhere in the middle of the spectrum between Visitor and Resident – leaning slightly more to the Visitor side. While I do have a digital identity, it is somewhat reserved. Although I find social media and connecting with others fun, I also value privacy and I am sure to limit the amount of personal information that I put online. I definitely enjoy and prefer offline situations and making in-person connections.

Wonder

Since my generation was one of the last to not have grown up with easy and plentiful access to different types of technologies (smartphones, laptops, iPads, etc.), I am curious as to what the Visitor/Resident map of someone who was immersed and surrounded by technology throughout their childhood would look like. How would their map compare to mine (or to the map of someone else from my generation? If I had to guess, I would think that their map would be fuller, as they would likely be accustomed to a plethora of technology tools/platforms, and would include more items on the resident side of the map, as I believe that there is a correlation between one’s abilities/level of ease when using technology and their digital footprint.

Resource

https://experimental.worldcat.org/vandrmapping/editMap

Reference

White, D. S., & Cornu, A. L. (2011). Visitors and Residents: A new typology for online engagement. First Monday.

Wow and Wonder #2

For this Wow and Wonder post, I will be responding to the article, “Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age

Wow

Connectivism is a relatively new concept for me. Initially, when I reflected on my own view of learning, I found that my views were more closely aligned with those of behaviorism and cognitivism where knowledge is external and the learning process is believed to be the act of internalizing knowledge. However, as I continue to learn about connectivism, I find myself agreeing with much of what I read. I love the idea of chaos and how “the learner’s challenge is to recognize the patterns which appear to be hidden” (Siemens, 2005) from the meaning that already exists. I think that this is a practical and meaningful way in which students can learn in order to become resourceful life-long learners.

Wonder

While it sounds great in theory, I am curious about how chaos would look in a classroom setting as each group of students is unique and will have their own diverse set of learning needs. Will the chaos be too open-ended and unstructured for certain students? Will students be able to behave appropriately and effectively self-organize themselves in order to use their time wisely with the freedom that comes with the chaos?

Reference

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1).

Wow and Wonder #1

For this Wow and Wonder post, I will be responding to the article, “What are Personal Learning Networks?

Screen capture from https://www.shiftelearning.com/blog/personal-learning-networks

Wow

The idea that one’s Personal Learning Network (PLN) is comprised of many meaningful and individual connections with the intention of learning from/with that person is a new concept for me. Originally, I thought a PLN was more similar to a Communities of Practice (CoP), where the people who make up your network are those who share your profession. I love the fact that PLNs can consist of informal and individual learning connections with anyone, from any field, as this can expand one’s unique network tremendously and allows for more information to be gathered and learned.

Wonder

On the flip side, I am curious if people ever run into issues of mistakenly creating connections with others who are providing them with inaccurate or unreliable information when trying to expand their PLN. Since informal connections are apart of our PLNs – how can we be sure that all of the information that we are gathering is credible? Although I believe that technology is a tremendous tool for learning, I wonder if there such thing as too much exposure or access?

Resource

https://www.shiftelearning.com/blog/personal-learning-networks