Revised (Topic 1) Blog Post: Human-Centered Learning – The Importance of Building Relationships, Clear Communication and Designing for Interactions and Engagement in K-12 Distributed and Open Learning Contexts

The process of building relationships with students is extremely important as it can make the classroom environment feel like a safe space to learn, help students with their academic work and aid in classroom management.  Jeffrey Martin (2019) argues that without the foundation of having built strong relationships in the classroom, “the engagement levels, respect, and trust of [the] students” (p. 2) as well as the likelihood of their success, would be severely reduced.  I truly believe, as Rita Pierson states in her Ted Talk, “kids don’t learn from people they don’t like” (TED, 2013).  In my experience, an effective way to strengthen relationships is with the mutual exchange of personal information so that people can connect over shared experiences, interests and opinions.  When people share pieces of themselves with others, it builds trust and empathy between them.  I always enjoy when a teacher shares information about their personal life and their past experiences because I find it easier to relate to them.

During a webinar with Dr. Barbara Brown, she advised us to use many great resources and applications such as Flipgrid (allows teachers to make grids to facilitate video discussions), Jamboard (allows students to post their own ideas on a board), recipe cards (great for asking questions) and Remind Messaging (do not have to use your own phone number to contact students) to assist in building relationships in an online learning environment.  Although I think that while it is easier to build relationships in face to face and open learning contexts, it is definitely achievable in online learning contexts as well.  When teaching in online learning contexts in my future teaching practice, I plan to use these tools as well as human-centered instruction (HCN) to assist in the development of relationships.  HCN focuses on the combination of building empathy and “improving both the act of instruction and its outcome” (“What is Human-Centered Instruction,” n.d.).  I also plan to use the Social Presence Model in order to develop a feeling of connectedness “among teachers and students for a more enriching educational experience” (Dikkers, Whiteside & Lewis, 2012, p. 22).  The five aspects of the Social Presence Model are:

  • Affective Association – how students and teachers show emotion online;
  • Community Cohesion – seeing the class as a community;
  • Instructor Involvement – how the teacher shows involvement in student learning;
  • Interaction Intensity – what ways and how often students interact; and
  • Knowledge and Experience – ways students share their prior knowledge and experiences with course content (Dikkers, 2018, p. 513)

I contacted a current grade 1 teacher to ask for her opinion on how she effectively builds relationships in online and open learning spaces.  Amanda Ford, stated that “relationships are the first things that [she works] on when school starts, before [she] even [considers] doing anything to do with academics” (personal communication, July 21, 2020).  In order to develop a sense of safety, belonging and community for her students in open and face to face learning spaces, Ford shares who she is as a person and as a teacher with her students, sends out surveys to the parents/guardians to understand what life is like outside of the classroom for her students, gives prompts for students to write about themselves, encourages the students to get to know each other through different activities (ex: “Find Someone Who…”) and co-creates the classroom rules and expectations with her students.  Throughout the school year, she also ensures to complete emotional check-ins with the students, promote role-playing activities to help with productive problem solving, model how to appropriately interact with others and how to equitably divide group work with different peers in order to foster clear communication and interaction.  While her experience with online learning spaces is more limited, Ford is planning on using several interactive digital tools in the future such as Microsoft Teams for “Get to Know You” activities, small group and class discussions and emotional check-ins throughout the year and Microsoft Forms to create and send out surveys to the parents/guardians and students as well as other activities.  Videos will also be used to record a “Meet the Teacher” clip and her lessons so her students can have a more personal experience with their teacher through the opportunity to hear and see her.  Ford’s goal is to provide her students with similar activities and strategies to the ones that she would normally use in open and face to face learning environments by modifying the activities in order to fit different digital tools/platforms.

Explanation for my revised blog post

Links to my other blog posts:

Topic 1 Blog Post

Topic 2 Blog Post

Topic 3 Blog Post

References

Dikkers, A. G. (2018) Social Interaction in K-12 Online Learning. In R. Ferdig & K. Kennedy (Eds.), Handbook of research on K-12 online and blended learning (pp. 509-522 ). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University ETC Press.

Dikkers, A. G., Whiteside, A. & Lewis, S. (2012). Get Present; Build Community and Connectedness Online. Learning and Leading with Technology. 2 (22-25). Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ991230.pdf

Martin, J. (2019). Building relationships and increasing engagement in the virtual classroom. The Journal of Educators Online, 16(1) doi:10.9743/jeo.2019.16.1.9

TED. (2013, May 3). Every kid needs a champion | Rita Pierson. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFnMTHhKdkw&feature=youtu.be

What is Human-Cantered Instruction. (n.d.) Retrieved from https://www.leadsv.com/hcn

Optional Activity #4 – Share Resources and Links About Topic 4 to #EDCI339

Below is a screenshot of my shared resource about Topic 4 on the #EDCI339 Twitter stream:

I completed this activity because I wanted to be able to explore and engage with current literature on the distributed and open education movement (learning outcome #2) and to conduct research into and critically reflect upon emerging and future educational technologies (learning outcome #5). I did not know what OER were prior to taking this course and I felt that the website, mentioned in my Twitter post above, did an excellent job of providing detailed explanations and examples of various OER. I thought that this was important to share with my peers so that they can learn how to use, find and create different OER as well.

My mind map in relation to the concepts and topics surrounding this activity

Resources

Examples of OER. (2020, July 6). Retrieved July 24, 2020, from https://libraryguides.lib.iup.edu/oer/examples

Wiley, D. & Hilton, J. (2018). Defining OER-enabled Pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19(4). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/3601

Optional Activity #3 – Add a Tweet to the #EDCI339 Course Hashtag

Below is a screenshot of my contribution to the #EDCI339 Twitter stream:

I completed this activity because I wanted to be able to examine and reflect upon the potential for equitable assess for all learners in online and open learning contexts (learning outcome #4) as well as practice digital, networked, and open literacies in support of learning about distributed and open learning (learning outcome #6). This course convinced me to finally join Twitter because it made me realize the value of involving platforms like Twitter in open learning environments. All learners have the opportunity to learn from and with each other, develop their own personal learning network (PLN) and make connections with other professionals in the field. I plan on using open platforms like Twitter in my future teaching practice and I hope to be able to effectively teach my students how to use these platforms through the knowledge and experience I gain by using them myself!

My mind map in relation to the concepts and topics surrounding this activity

Resources

About Universal Design for Learning. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.cast.org/our-work/about-udl.html?utm_source=udlguidelines&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=none&utm_content=homepage#.Xxtwni0ZNR0

Basham, J.D., Blackorby, J., Stahl, S. & Zhang, L. (2018) Universal Design for Learning Because Students are (the) Variable. In R. Ferdig & K. Kennedy (Eds.), Handbook of research on K-12 online and blended learning (pp. 477-507). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University ETC Press.

Kral, I. & Schwab, R.G. (2012). Chapter 4: Design Principles for Indigenous Learning Spaces. Safe Learning Spaces. Youth, Literacy and New Media in Remote Indigenous Australia. ANU Press. http://doi.org/10.22459/LS.08.2012 Retrieved from:   http://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p197731/pdf/ch041.pdf

Optional Activity #2 – Webinar with Dr. Randy Labonte & Dr. Michael Barbour

Shown below are my notes that I took and the pieces of information that I learned during the Webinar with Dr. Randy LaBonte and Dr. Michael Barbour:

I completed this activity because I wanted to be able to critically reflect on and articulate concepts around modality, pedagogy, and access, including distributed and open learning theory, online and open learning history, privacy laws, online learning communities, open research, and open data (learning outcome #3).  After gaining this knowledge, I now understand the difference between open and online learning and I have a better idea for how to provide effective methods of instruction, use different assessment strategies and set suitable learning objectives in these contexts.

My mind map in relation to the concepts and topics surrounding this activity

References

Bates, T. (2014). Learning Theories and Online
Learning. [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.tonybates.ca/2014/07/29/learning-theories-and-online-learning/

Jo Harris. (2014, February 24). A Brief Overview of 4 Learning Theories. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACowHxGEAUg

Roberts, V. , Blomgren, C. Ishmael, K. & Graham, L. (2018) Open Educational Practices in K-12 Online and Blended Learning Environments. In R. Ferdig & K.Kennedy (Eds.), Handbook of research on K-12 online and blended learning (pp. 527–544). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University ETC Press.

Optional Activity #1 – Webinar with Dr. Barbara Brown

Shown below are my notes that I took and the pieces of information that I learned during the Webinar with Dr. Barbara Brown:

I completed this activity because I wanted to develop an awareness of the potential of human-centered learning in online and open learning contexts (learning outcome #1) as well as conduct research into and critically reflect upon emerging and future educational technologies (learning outcome #5). The webinar provided me with an abundance of useful recourses and ideas for how to use various digital tools in order to build relationships and focus on the learning needs of the students, especially in the context of online learning. This will be very helpful for my future teaching practice!

My mind map in relation to the concepts and topics surrounding this activity

Resources

Dikkers, A. G. (2018) Social Interaction in K-12 Online Learning. In R. Ferdig & K. Kennedy (Eds.), Handbook of research on K-12 online and blended learning (pp. 509-522 ). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University ETC Press.

Ferlazzo, L. (2012, May 16). Fostering Relationships in the Classroom. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/blog/fostering-classroom-relationships-larry-ferlazzo-katie-hull-sypnieski

TED. (2013, May 3). Everykid needs a champion | Rita Pierson. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFnMTHhKdkw&feature=youtu.be